"The Wolfman" Review

A Puerto Rican Werewolf in London!

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 2/18/2010 1:08 AM Kittie wrote:
    It's hard to watch some of the parts of this movie because of the light flashes. Usually used for the flashback; I just had to look away AND close my eyes. -_-

    And the *dramatic music-then-BAM* effect was used one too many times. :\
    Reply to this
    1. 7/21/2010 2:30 PM Boat trailer wheels wrote:
      I wasn't familiar with Joe Johnston by name either, but I looked him up and after The Rocketeer he did October Sky
      Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 1:54 AM Chris C. wrote:
    I had to pause the video at the 4:43 mark to let it load, and I ended up getting a still of Brad that's gonna stay with me for days. XD

    As for the movie, I might give it a rental. I too love Hugo Weaving and hearing that he steals the movie is music to my ears.
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 2:05 AM sk wrote:
    i hate to go off topic like that but does anybody know a good online shop in europe that seels evil dead shirts like that? i love it!
    Reply to this
    1. 2/18/2010 5:21 AM Sparntz wrote:
      Have you tried K-Mart?
      Reply to this
      1. 2/18/2010 3:22 PM Flo wrote:
        Congratulations, you are an idiot!
        Reply to this
      2. 2/18/2010 11:14 PM sk wrote:
        I only know S-Mart
        Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 2:36 AM Dan wrote:
    I wasn't familiar with Joe Johnston by name either, but I looked him up and after The Rocketeer he did October Sky, which I thought was great. Jurassic Park III though, eh. But anyway, you've convinced me to check out The Wolfman once it's a rental, it sounds pretty...alright.
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 2:38 AM Chandler wrote:
    I love at 5:50ish when the cat shadow just sort of appears in on the blinds, I was really hoping he would jump out and attack you.
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 2:40 AM jnywest wrote:
    Here is a new movie idea for ya...
    "Shadow of the Werecat"
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 2:55 AM Tam Lin wrote:
    Respectfully, I disagree with Brad here, I think this new "Wolfman" broke a lot of new ground. Whereas the 40s movie was restrained by the social sensibilities of its age, this movie is allowed to go full-tilt with the violence and the themes of dangerously repressed sexuality (Oedipus complex ALL over this movie).
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 7:42 AM Anonymous wrote:
    Exactly what I thought. The movie, as it seems, doesn't bring nothing new to the Werewolf lore. It's interesting to see another werewolf movie and the gore, as I understand, is plentiful but the movie isn't genre defying. I'd prefer to see Monster Squad or Wolf ( Jack Nicholson would of made an awesome Wolverine) or even Bad Moon that had an awesome looking werewolf. As I understand the movie was in development hell because they had to make allot of last minute changes like the Director.

    On the bright side maybe Joe Johnston's Captain America will be awesome since he did a pretty good job with The Rocketeer.
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 8:31 AM Krystian wrote:
    I think thet there's not enouch werewolf movies... EVEN the shitty ones! I can name good Werewolf movies on my crippled four fingered hand. (Mind you good werewolf movie has to have at least one TF scene) and J. Nickolson Werewolf movie is my criped thumb. (it's there cus it's a good movie but it's not a werewolf movie.)
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 9:38 AM Viewer wrote:
    The Wolfman looked rather pointless from the start. There is simply no greater point to it. No arch.

    Again... Great British action/horror/comedy with werewolfs: Dog Soldiers (2002). Very good threading through a very simple story and it works great. It's very close to Evil Dead 2 or Shawn of the Dead but with werewolfs instead of demon zombies.

    It proves that you don't need crap load of money, nor famous actors for a good horror film. Just a decent story (care about your characters!), good pacing and some creative imagination. Unfortunately, Wolfman goes heavy on names and visualls but lacks in the other departments.

    And why can't they make a 90 minutes film anymore even when they don't have enough story for 2 and change hours!
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 10:23 AM Jonny T wrote:
    hahah, trying to out hugo weaving himself' that was pretty funny and i did think that when watching it myself. if you want a really good site to use for streaming tv shows you should try ninjavideo.net, its pretty damn good for all sorts of tv show, but not for films, if you want a really good site for streaming new and old movies try quicksilverscreen.com's forums or alluc.org for both tv and films.
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 11:35 AM Rutledal wrote:
    Pretty much summed up what I was expecting from the movie so looks like it'll have to wait for rental.

    Also, nice cameo by your cat.
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 12:26 PM banthafett wrote:
    This movie sucked. Its another one of those "seen one you seen them all" types of movie. This should have been an epic groundbreaking movie. Werewolf movies need something epic. Groundbreaking is AWIL, but its not epic.

    I just really pissed off, that Werewolves are my favorite, and it gets shit on so many times.

    Who rents movies anymore? All you have to do is wait 2-3 weeks after dvd release and the single disc version is 5 bucks or less at walmart. Granted some might not want a crummy movie in their collection, but I sure in the hell dont want a movie that was touched with by a jizzed covered hand by me.
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 12:48 PM Chino de Sade wrote:
    I'm still waiting for some Werewolf movie to bring something new to the table. I mean Zombie-Movies had those fast-zombies and handcamera, vampire movies had Daybreakers and the whole romantic-schtick, where's the new and improved Werewolf movie?

    Hands down "Dog Soldiers" is my favourite so far. Except for that one I saw once late at night on tv, where they exchanged a werewolfs skin with metal in a science-lab and had to kill it in the end with a rocket-launcher. Damn I wish I'd remembered the name of that movie...and I googled fpr it a lot! Anyone know what movie I mean?
    Reply to this
    1. 2/18/2010 1:13 PM Chino de Sade wrote:
      Haha, I can't believe this. Encouraged by my post I started googling and goddamnit, I found it! It was called "Project: Metalbeast" - Now all I hope for is a decent release! Thanks very much for reminding me of this
      Reply to this
    2. 2/18/2010 2:31 PM Tam LIn wrote:
      Well, yeah, I guess "fast zombies" and handcamera are certainly new, but they're also complete garbage. And the "romantic" vampire has been around for hundreds of years, and is HARDLY the best thing about the subgenre these days. Honestly, these myths endure because of the constancy of the tropes, not because of originality.

      The move you saw was "Project Metalwolf", btw.
      Reply to this
    3. 2/18/2010 2:32 PM Tam LIn wrote:
      Well, yeah, I guess "fast zombies" and handcamera are certainly new, but they're also complete garbage. And the "romantic" vampire has been around for going on two hundred years, and is HARDLY the best thing about the subgenre these days. Honestly, these myths endure because of the constancy of the tropes, not because of originality.
      Reply to this
      1. 2/18/2010 6:30 PM Chino de Sade wrote:
        I never said that these variations were any good It's just that you get a little suprise everytime you go to the movies. The way Brad described Wolfman it's again the same Werewolf-Movie we all saw a thousand times. Nevertheless I will definetely check it out!
        Reply to this
        1. 2/19/2010 4:26 AM Tam Lin wrote:
          Well yeah, nearly every werewolf movie is the same werewolf movie, with the exception of "Dog Soldiers", "The Howling", and I guess the "Underworld" movies, although those don't really count since they're not horror movies but just action movies that happen to have werewolves.

          Genearlly, the only variation is execution, and what you want to use werewolfism as a metaphor for. This being technically a remake, it's even less original than others, although as mentioned before, I liked how it had the freedom to do and say things that latter-day werewolf movies clearly wanted to, but couldn't.
          Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 1:50 PM Jyri wrote:
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Honey, I Shrunk The Kids!
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 5:01 PM Peasant nr2 wrote:
    Saw this movie yesterday. I thought it was not perticularly good, it was so overdrawn with jumpscares and cheesy stuff.

    The funniest part was the torture scene at the asylum, with the big mechanical wheels and winch operated by the clished evil/stupid assistant.
    I was the only one laughing at that scene though.
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 5:02 PM torsoboy wrote:
    The Wolfman is easily one of the best Hammer Horror films never made.

    I'm trying to recall, but didn't we go to a later showing of the movie due to the fact that we couldn't make ourselves stop watching the t.v. show you were alluding to?
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 5:45 PM cablecarcrash wrote:
    Great review, Brad. I probably won't see The Wolfman in theaters, but I might really want to see this movie if you can answer one question: do any of the wolfmen in the movie get kicked in the nards, especially by a dumpy boy named Horace? Actually, fuck it, I'll just go watch Monster Squad instead.
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 6:52 PM Esteban wrote:
    I have a coworker that actually worships Joe Johnston... but he also thinks a big screen remake of the C.O.P.S. cartoon would be the greatest movie ever made.
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 9:33 PM MartialHorror wrote:
    I love Joe Johnston!(kidding, kidding). I did love this movie though. Not sure why I seem to be the only one.
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 10:31 PM Joe wrote:
    What? You didn't like "Honey, I Shrunk the Kids? Come on.
    Reply to this
  • 2/18/2010 11:19 PM noyer wrote:
    While I agree the film isn't brilliant, I have to admit that I believe the film is far better than it is being given credit your, as I argue in my review at my blog. Blunt's character is at the center of the film's whole Oedipus themes, and her lack of presences is kind of the point: these are men driven by the absence of the original mother figure/wife. The introduction of the substitute figure triggers the events of the film, and the whole sending her away makes a psychological sense in the avoiding the feeling of loss again.
    Reply to this
    1. 2/19/2010 4:30 AM Tam Lin wrote:
      Right, the conflict is basically three men (although of course Benicio's brother's role is clearly minimal in the movie itself) vying for the prize of one woman, but none of the three are actually interested in or addressing the woman herself, only her role as an analogue for another character.

      Her absence is thematically appropriate, since as far as the male characters are concerned she's not really there even when she is, she's just filling in for someone else.
      Reply to this
      1. 2/19/2010 1:47 PM noyer wrote:
        That is a much, MUCH better way of putting it than I did. Well done!
        Reply to this
  • 2/20/2010 12:30 AM Dan wrote:
    Del Toro was seriously miscasted for this movie
    Reply to this
  • 2/20/2010 4:06 AM Viewer wrote:
    There's also a TV movie called Full Eclipse (1993) with Mario Van Peebles, Patsy Kensit and Bruce Payne, directed by Anthony Hickox (Waxwork). It wasn't very good (strong start, lame middle, stupid finish) but it has a few interesting ideas (like blood of the werewolf as a drug).
    Reply to this
  • 2/21/2010 2:36 AM Sly Deaths Head wrote:
    I thought October Sky was a great film.
    Reply to this
  • 2/21/2010 10:38 AM Stopmotion Dinosaur wrote:
    The real wolfman;
    http://i994.photobucket.com/albums/af70/stopmotiondino/Movie%20gifs/breakitdown.gif
    Reply to this
  • 2/22/2010 10:20 AM LucasChad wrote:
    I saw that movie yesterday and it has parts that's good (makeup/transformations) and parts that's ridiculous (characters/story), but I agree about Hugo Weaving because he's usually great in any role he's in whether he's Smith, Elrond, or V!

    Hey Brad, I would like to point out that the correct title of the Hammer werewolf film with Oliver Reed you were thinking of is CURSE OF THE WEREWOLF! It's ok at first, but it might be a tad better than this movie.

    Lastly, I feel this movie ode a lot more to AWIL rather than the original Wolf Man down to the London chase. It has its own odd balance that makes AWIL hold up better.
    Reply to this
  • 2/22/2010 2:42 PM James wrote:
    You do a great Hugo Weaving. He did steal this film. He plays the same character that Johnny Depp played in From Hell.
    Reply to this
  • 6/14/2010 12:37 PM glenn wrote:
    Finally saw this.
    Er, it is not very good. Bad CGI, ye- olde-worlde attempts to appear classy and Anthony Hopkins looks Santa from The Santa Clause movies!
    Also it was another one of those under-lit everything blacker than everything else films. So it was more a case of Werewolf, where wolf, there wolf.
    Reply to this
  • 6/28/2010 5:46 PM The Film General wrote:
    http://blip.tv/file/3808834

    Personally, I really liked the film... sure it is flawed but it is way too much fun if you let your brain slip a bit and go with the mad, goofiness that is being thrown on the screen. Click on teh link to hear my review, you will see what I mean.
    Reply to this
  • 7/21/2010 12:37 PM AnarchicQ wrote:
    I tried watching it as a spiritual companion to Bram Stoker's Dracula...it felt like a shameless carbon copy. It actually felt like a cobbled together wolfman made from other movies...
    Reply to this
  • 7/24/2010 9:20 AM Ben wrote:
    Hey Brad, that was a pretty good Michael J. Fox impression
    Reply to this
  • 8/14/2010 12:17 AM online slots wrote:
    This fantastic wtf was up with this movie.I never heard of George Lazenby but it looked like he would've been a great James Bond to carry on the mantle of Sean Connery but because of the smoke in those times he didn't make a good decisions. I mean damn I think the whole crew was high in that movie.
    Reply to this
  • 8/20/2010 8:32 PM chanel bracelet wrote:
    of civilians, and most recently louis vuitton charm bracelet the July 15 VBIED [car replica breitling bomb]  to instill fear omega constellation chronometer among rivals, law enforcement and chanel double c earrings the general public."
    The Ciudad Juarez d&g watches car bomb was particularly cruel, rado anatom and effective, because the cartel
    Reply to this
  • 8/23/2010 1:29 AM Slama Pofer wrote:
    I love your post , Its make me always come back to read your new post,
    of cause I also read your old post as this one ,徵信社還有婚前徵信以及花蓮民宿跟一些徵信的服務
    Reply to this
  • 8/31/2010 10:00 PM Bvlgari Jewelry wrote:
    A convoy carrying gucci mane new jewelry the huge
    Reply to this
  • 11/3/2010 5:00 AM Send Flowers to UK wrote:
    I am absolutely amazed at how terrific the stuff is on this site. I have saved this webpage and I truly intend on visiting the site in the upcoming days. Keep up the excellent work!Canada flower shops| Send Flowers to USA
    Reply to this
  • 6/14/2011 12:58 PM nnsadjwewey wrote:
    wsxj d kftmki
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.